Last November, the American majority booted the Democrat Party that holds average folks in contempt. The respect for fairly assessed popular will that Democrats claim would dictate that they accept their loss. But they have not.
Before examining present-day manifestations, though, consider this indicator only recently passed:
After perhaps having been steered to his chair by a bunny-costumed aide or two, and summoning his scant enduring wits, global laughingstock/erstwhile, supposed chief executive Joe Biden announced his (thankful) farewell. He mechanically pronounced sentiments penned by some unknown, stumbling occasionally.
"I know that believing in the idea of America means respecting the institutions that have governed a free society: the presidency, the congress, the courts," the calcified career politico croaked, his nose extending by the syllable.
Fine words. None of which he sincerely held fast. Choreographed lawfare perpetrated with the ambition of crippling his leading electoral competitor (the chosen candidate of most American voters) hardly aligns with such grand speechifying.
(Nor do Democrats' underhanded shenanigans calculated to remove Trump from state ballots. Nor does the unelected, mysterious staffer who forged Biden's name on critical documents by dint of autopen.)
So, pay no heed to Democrats' rhetorical professions of devotion to the democratic ideal. They pretend at rectitude only as cover for their support of left totalitarianism.
Just as leftist archfiends Mao and Stalin engineered the murders of millions, Democrats enable and cheer millions of infant bodies being cruelly sawed into salable scraps. (Recall, too, that detestable national socialist Adolf Hitler also marched to that drum.)
Founder Thomas Jefferson cautioned about judicial seizing of control in America: Were the Constitution adapted to whatever unelected judges' whims might be, then that vital document would be like "a mere thing of wax, that they could twist and shape into any form they please."
The undemocratic filth of which he spoke now throbs.
"It's incredibly apparent that there is a concerted effort by the far left to judge shop, to pick judges who are clearly acting as partisan activists from the bench in an attempt to derail this president's agenda," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, during a March 19 press conference.
She added: "We will not allow that to happen," and noted some 60 injunctions cobbled by judicial-branch quislings had already been levied against President Trump.
Fox News noted that 125 lawsuits have been brought against the president in what brief time has so far passed in his second term. One word describes those and the frivolous injunctions small-pond magistrates have contrived: Lawfare.
Two nationwide criminal trends presently a-rage in reptilian Democrat precincts are Tesla-related terrorism (vandalism, arson, and destruction of private property, whose true target is effective Trump ally Elon Musk) and "swatting" - the deceitful direction of armed SWAT teams to locations associated with non-criminal ideological adversaries.
Neither promotes democracy.
Grassroots shock-troops conceal their faces with terrorist head-wraps, and slash and burn Tesla electric vehicles and associated dealerships. These masked monsters are following the fetid teaching of Bill Ayres and other radical cretins, that violence is a morally acceptible tactic for political advancement.
Compare: Republicans reacted to Bud Light's parading garish poofter Dylan Mulvaney by no longer purchasing products. Democrats respond to displeasing circumstances by destroying and attacking.
Sean Hannity correctly observed during the 3/19 broadcast of his show that Democrats only condemn political violence that doesn't bear their cloven hoof-prints. To this writer's knowledge, no office-holding member of that unfortunate party has condemned nation-spanning maliciousness aimed at Musk.
Additional attestation knocked as this essay was under draft:
Upon learning of an impending review by cost-shearing DOGE representatives, Biden-appointed bureaucrats - who may or may not have been legitimately productive - literally barricaded themselves in offices. Their dishonorable ambitions were to interfere in governmental investigation of tax dollar-expenditures, and cling to publicly-funded positions of power in defiance of federal authority.
Civil behavior, non-violence, ethical propriety - like democracy itself, those praiseworthy concepts are without import to ideological micreants whose sole desire is unending dominance.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
